Carrie Andrews Is Right — It Was Horrifying Last Night at County Legislature Meeting
Democratic County Legislator Carrie Andrews described the scene at the County Legislature as horrifying.
She’s the one who wrote that many of her male co-workers regularly try to steal a glance down her blouse in a D&C essay last year– I mention this to point out how healthy her self-esteem is and to also point out I’m glad I don’t work where ever it is she works — apparently they are hard up for attractive women there. I lifted the following quote off of Mustardstreet who included it in a post they did awhile back.
Andrews offered a further revelation of deplorable working conditions for NYSUT’s own employees:
I have experienced sitting in a business meeting knowing full well that the person I’m working with is more interested in sneaking glances down my blouse than listening to what I was saying.
She was absolutely right (about last night’s meeting — I doubt her work story — personally, it takes at least a B cup to get my attention) but for the wrong reason.
The whole public defender fiasco was horrifying, but as you might guess, Legislator Andrews had the wrong reasons. It is embarrassing that a state elected official did not fulfill his legal obligation to be in Albany so he could disrupt the proceedings of the Monroe County Legislature.
Carrie Andrews asked why cheerleaders weren’t made to go through metal detectors. If she really doesn’t know the answer to this question, she doesn’t belong in public office.
How many cheerleaders promised to disrupt a Legislature meeting to get what they wanted?
How many cheerleaders were arrested at a committee meeting three days before a legislature meeting?
How many cheerleaders have been taken from a legislature meeting shouting something along the lines of “this is the type of stuff that lead to people being shot at at that city council meeting last week (the one in suburban St. Louis)”? Update: see it for yourself.
How many cheerleaders were on WDKX radio inciting racial tension and telling people to come to the meeting and cause a ruckus because they were not given what they claimed was theirs because of a process that was used over 30 years ago?
Maybe Carrie Andrews didn’t see the channel 13 raw video of Gantt and his friends storming the floor of that public safety committee meeting a couple of weeks ago where Gantt used his considerable bulk to bully the female officer. Maybe Carrie wasn’t at the meeting on Saturday — the one where it took almost 2 hours to clear the legislative chambers.
If security was not as it was last night, police would have had to arrest dozens, if not hundreds of people. The meeting might very well have not happened. We are a nation of laws. Our system is set up so that everyone is treated fairly. Just because someone is passionate about something doesn’t mean they have a say in what goes on. Personally, I’d love to see the United States out of the war in Iraq. What meeting can I go and disrupt and take control of to stop this injustice?
Paul Haney complained about a nun not being allowed in the chambers and appeared to blame Republicans. Dan Quatro, the new Republican Leader pointed out correctly that the outrage should be directed at the people who promised to disrupt the meeting.
What would Carrie Andrews, Paul Haney and the Democrats say if a group that wasn’t a part of Democratic Party’s base acted the way Gantt and company did. What if the evangelical community brought hundreds of people, incited their followers on religious radio, and had disrupted two previous meetings, to protest the gradual legal erosion of the concept that marriage is between one man and one woman?
Would they be horrified? Would they be trembling? I don’t think so. Treating Assemblyman Gantt and his followers differently than you would treat others is racism — plain and simple. For the Democrats to claim otherwise is hypocritical.
