Entries Tagged as 'MisterF'

Dr. Strained Love Or: How I Stopped Worrying and Learned to Love McCain

I recently had a conversation with a young friend who expressed his displeasure at the lack of conservative candidates in this presidential election cycle. His feeling, shared my many on the right, is obviously that John McCain is not a “real” conservative. I’ve heard this sentiment from many conservatives in the past few months - from high profile squawkers like Rush Limbaugh and James Dobson to rank and file folks in my everyday life. I’m more than a little sympathetic to their complaints. I myself have spent no small amount of mental energy since the New Hampshire primary trying to come to terms with the reality that John McCain will be the Republican (and by extension, conservative) standard bearer for 2008.

The list of conservative grievances against McCain is long, but I think the least forgivable are McCain-Feingold Campaign Finance Reform (I challenge you to find a bigger legislative travesty), his vote against the Bush tax cuts, and his participation in the so-called Gang of 14. [Read more →]

McCain Rising

While Obama dances around the growing racial land mines, and Clinton ratchets up her seen and unseen efforts to paint him as unelectable, John McCain has been quietly rising in the polls. See this report at Real Clear Politics that shows him overtaking Obama in the wake of, well, let’s call it Wright-Gate. You’ll see there that a recent Rasmussen poll has McCain leading Obama by seven points among likely voters. Then there’s this one that shows his recent rise against Clinton. Note the Rasmussen poll that has him up 10 points among likely voters. I guess there’s nothing more presidential than staying out of the news.

Why Obama’s Pastor Matters

On September 16, 2001, I was driving through Chicago with my wife. We were on our way back from visiting family in Wisconsin for a week. Obviously, this vacation was more than marred by the events of 9-11. As we drove through a toll booth outside of the city, I was struck by what I saw on the electronic signs. They said simply, “God Bless America.” There was very little traffic that day, in part because of the fact that it was late on a Sunday morning, but much more because of the horrors that had occurred just days before. A Major League Baseball game I was supposed to attend the day before had been canceled. The NFL games scheduled for that week had also been canceled. It was as if the whole world had stopped. The country was shocked, and it was united. Bitter congressional rivals stood outside the Capitol Building, singing “God Bless America.” Little did I know at the time, that just a few short miles from where I sat marveling at how the country seemed to be of one mind, Rev. Jeremiah Wright was delivering this message to his congregation at Trinity United Church of Christ:

We bombed Hiroshima, we bombed Nagasaki, and we nuked far more than the thousands in New York and the Pentagon, and we never batted an eye. We have supported state terrorism against the Palestinians and black South Africans, and now we are indignant because the stuff we have done overseas is now brought right back to our own front yards. America’s chickens are coming home to roost.

Of course we all know that Wright has become significant now because he has been Barack Obama’s pastor for 20 years, marrying Obama and his wife Michelle and baptizing their children. Wright was also an adviser to Obama until this story broke. Now Obama has distanced himself from Wright and denounced these statements and others that have been well documented.

From the passage above, you can see that Wright found it prudent to blame America for 9-11, even as the towers smoldered and rescue workers searched for survivors among the thousands of casualties. What you don’t get from that passage is the bitter anger and hatred in this man’s voice. I think it’s Wright’s tone that will end up hurting Obama even more than his actual words. This man has clearly been spewing hatred for America and for whites for decades, and his tone and words will be echoing in the ears of many white voters in this Democratic primary and the general election if Obama is the nominee.

It seemed like Obama was well on his way to overcoming the biggest obstacle that any minority presidential candidate faces: convincing the majority of Americans that he speaks for them and not just the grievances of his minority constituents. That’s why Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton could never be serious presidential candidates. Obama’s tone has been different. He’s been open and conciliatory and seemingly genuinely so. Now his opponents (and more importantly their surrogates) have the opportunity to paint him with the hateful brush of his former pastor’s words.

In his recent speech on the matter, I think Obama really pegged Wright’s rhetoric perfectly:

The profound mistake of Reverend Wright’s sermons is not that he spoke about racism in our society. It’s that he spoke as if our society was static; as if no progress has been made; as if this country – a country that has made it possible for one of his own members to run for the highest office in the land and build a coalition of white and black; Latino and Asian, rich and poor, young and old — is still irrevocably bound to a tragic past.

Those are powerful words, but will they drown out the hate speech of Jeremiah Wright in the minds of voters? I doubt it.

What Has Hillary Clinton Done For You?

You don’t have to listen all that hard to hear the ridiculously transparent “McCain/Bush” references by Obama, Clinton and their surrogates in a tepid attempt to link the Republican nominee with the record of a currently unpopular president. But while Hill and the gang try to taint McCain by trying to make him responsible for someone else’s record, it makes perfect sense to take a good look at Hillary’s actual record.

Now, we all know that there is enough dirt on the Bill Clinton presidency to fill up the headlines of every election cycle from now until Suri Cruise runs for Supreme Emperor of the Universe in 2052, but Hillary’s only experience has come as the junior senator from our great state of New York. When she first ran for the Senate in 2000, Hillary’s big promise to folks in our region was that she would create 200,000 new Upstate New York jobs. This is, of course, a ridiculous claim, as are all claims by politicians that they will “create jobs.” The only way a politician can “create” a job is to take more of your money through taxes to pay the salary. Politicians can encourage employment by keeping taxes and regulation to a minimum, but that really means that they just need to get out of the way of private enterprise. Hillary failed even at that, because not only did she not “create” 200,000 Upstate New York jobs, the region has actually seen a net loss of jobs during her time in the Senate.

When asked about this by Tim Russert (who clearly doesn’t care much for Hillary) at a recent Democratic debate, Hillary made the laughable excuse that she expected Al Gore to be president when she made that promise. Bush, she insists, is the one to blame for the region’s economic woes. She apparently didn’t have time to elaborate on the ways in which Bush foiled her many Upstate New York job creation initiatives.

Although the upcoming general election will include no incumbents, be prepared to hear a whole lot of “are you better off than you were four years ago?” nonsense from the Democratic nominee. If Clinton ends up being that nominee (or even the nominee’s running mate), I hope voters in this region will take a moment to ask if Upstate New York is better off than it was eight years ago.